Review





Similar Products

mouse/rat tlr7 antibody  (Bio-Techne corporation)
93
Bio-Techne corporation mouse/rat tlr7 antibody
Mouse/Rat Tlr7 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+tlr7/Mouse%2FRat+TLR7+Antibody/bio-techne+corporation___mab7156
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse/rat tlr7 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
blocking solution  (Boster Bio)
90
Boster Bio blocking solution
Blocking Solution, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+tlr7/Anti-TLR7+Antibody+Picoband/pmc12978692-74-8-13
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
blocking solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
antibodies against tlr7  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against tlr7
Antibodies Against Tlr7, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+tlr7/Toll-like+Receptor+7+Rabbit+mAb/pm41772660-70-13-19
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against tlr7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tlr7  (Proteintech)
93
Proteintech tlr7
Effect of BSHXR on the expression of inflammatory factors. (A) The mRNA expression of TLR2, TLR4, and <t>TLR7</t> in decidual tissue (n = 6). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0036; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0443; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0034; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0097; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0260; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0051; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0104; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0315; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0229). (B) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissues. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) The protein expression of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissue. (D) Quantification of the protein levels (n = 3). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0062; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0158; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0222; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. BSHXR, p < 0.0001; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0099; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0129; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0045). The results are expressed as the means ± SEMs. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, compared with the control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 and, ### p < 0.0001, compared with the RSA group.
Tlr7, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+tlr7/TLR7+Antibody/pmc12957807-71-6-14
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tlr7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
immunohistochemistry  (Proteintech)
93
Proteintech immunohistochemistry
Effect of BSHXR on the expression of inflammatory factors. (A) The mRNA expression of TLR2, TLR4, and <t>TLR7</t> in decidual tissue (n = 6). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0036; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0443; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0034; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0097; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0260; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0051; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0104; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0315; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0229). (B) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissues. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) The protein expression of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissue. (D) Quantification of the protein levels (n = 3). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0062; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0158; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0222; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. BSHXR, p < 0.0001; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0099; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0129; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0045). The results are expressed as the means ± SEMs. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, compared with the control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 and, ### p < 0.0001, compared with the RSA group.
Immunohistochemistry, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+tlr7/TLR7+Antibody/pm41684130-83-4-10
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunohistochemistry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Effect of BSHXR on the expression of inflammatory factors. (A) The mRNA expression of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissue (n = 6). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0036; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0443; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0034; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0097; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0260; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0051; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0104; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0315; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0229). (B) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissues. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) The protein expression of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissue. (D) Quantification of the protein levels (n = 3). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0062; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0158; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0222; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. BSHXR, p < 0.0001; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0099; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0129; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0045). The results are expressed as the means ± SEMs. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, compared with the control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 and, ### p < 0.0001, compared with the RSA group.

Journal: Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine

Article Title: Bushen Huoxue Recipe enhances the immune microenvironment at the maternal-fetal interface via the Hippo signaling pathway in mice with recurrent spontaneous abortion

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2025.02.005

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of BSHXR on the expression of inflammatory factors. (A) The mRNA expression of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissue (n = 6). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0036; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0443; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0034; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0097; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0260; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0051; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0104; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0315; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0229). (B) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissues. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) The protein expression of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR7 in decidual tissue. (D) Quantification of the protein levels (n = 3). (TLR2: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0062; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0158; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0222; TLR4: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0001; RSA vs. BSHXR, p < 0.0001; TLR7: Con vs. RSA, p = 0.0099; RSA vs. CsA, p = 0.0129; RSA vs. BSHXR, p = 0.0045). The results are expressed as the means ± SEMs. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, compared with the control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 and, ### p < 0.0001, compared with the RSA group.

Article Snippet: Antibodies against TLR2 (66645-1-Ig), TLR4 (66350-1-Ig), TLR7 (17232-1-AP), and GAPDH (60004-1-Ig) were purchased from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA); antibodies against RORγt (ab207082) and FoxP3 (ab215206) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA); Alexa Fluor 555 nm (8953) and antibodies against MST (14946), p-MST (49332), LATS (3477S), p-LATS (8654S), YAP (14074S), p-YAP (13008S), TAZ (83669S), and p-TAZ (59971S) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); and an antibody against Lamin B (A11495) was purchased from ABclonal (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Control